Investment Institute
Macroeconomics

Targeting the Target


  • Very good news on US inflation, but the rebound of real wages will help the hawks
  • More voices are calling for raising the central banks’ inflation target.
  • China needs a stimulus, but the policy space is probably less wide than commonly thought

There was not much to dislike in the US inflation print for June, with all the main components of core going in the right direction. This keeps our hope alive that the Fed’s July hike will be the last one. Real wages need to be monitored though: US employees have been gaining purchasing power again since May. This could re-start consumption, and make the “last mile” of disinflation, down to 2%, more difficult. This is the type of issues which are likely to keep the debate on the post-July trajectory live at the FOMC.

It's unlikely that inflation can completely normalize without a tangible contraction in aggregate demand, and a crucial issue is how deep such contraction needs to go, and whether central banks should tolerate a higher inflation regime, given the potential cost of going all the way to 2%, and lift their target. O. Blanchard had reopened this debate last October, and we hear more voices supporting such a shift. As much as there may be a theoretical case for lifting the inflation target, we think the ramifications for long-term interest rates can be so adverse that it could become counter-productive, e.g., by making the cost of the green transition – one of the forces possibly pushing inflation up – even higher. We are also concerned by the long-term competitiveness impact.

While the West is debating whether 3% inflation would be acceptable, China is dealing with a real deflation trap risk. A stimulus is needed to deal with the current aggregate demand deficit, and the central bank has been operating with much caution so far. Focus is turning to fiscal policy, and expectations are building around announcements which could be made at a Politburo meeting later this month. There are only difficult choices though. The plight of the Local Governments Financing Vehicles is drawing attention to the fact that the policy space is probably less wide than often thought. In any case, China should probably distance itself from its usual approach to stimulus – pouring more capex in the economy – and focus on consumption.

Related Articles

Macroeconomics

Dry Powder: Ready to Fire, or Collecting Dust?

Macroeconomics

Fiscal Standoff

Macroeconomics

Electrify Europe

    Disclaimer

    This document is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment research or financial analysis relating to transactions in financial instruments as per MIF Directive (2014/65/EU), nor does it constitute on the part of AXA Investment Managers or its affiliated companies an offer to buy or sell any investments, products or services, and should not be considered as solicitation or investment, legal or tax advice, a recommendation for an investment strategy or a personalized recommendation to buy or sell securities.

    It has been established on the basis of data, projections, forecasts, anticipations and hypothesis which are subjective. Its analysis and conclusions are the expression of an opinion, based on available data at a specific date.

    All information in this document is established on data made public by official providers of economic and market statistics. AXA Investment Managers disclaims any and all liability relating to a decision based on or for reliance on this document. All exhibits included in this document, unless stated otherwise, are as of the publication date of this document.

    Furthermore, due to the subjective nature of these opinions and analysis, these data, projections, forecasts, anticipations, hypothesis, etc. are not necessary used or followed by AXA IM’s portfolio management teams or its affiliates, who may act based on their own opinions. Any reproduction of this information, in whole or in part is, unless otherwise authorised by AXA IM, prohibited.

    Issued in the UK by AXA Investment Managers UK Limited, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority in the UK. Registered in England and Wales No: 01431068. Registered Office: 22 Bishopsgate London EC2N 4BQ

    In other jurisdictions, this document is issued by AXA Investment Managers SA’s affiliates in those countries.

    Back to top
    Are you a Professional Investor ?

    This website is available in English only and directed at professional, institutional or qualified investors. It is not suitable for retail investors. As such, some of the funds, products and services described on this website are not available for retail investors under the MiFID II (Directive 2014/65/UE). By pressing accept you confirm that you are a professional investor and agree to AXA Investment Managers' Legal Information and Terms of Use.